翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2) ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 3) ・ R v Bowden ・ R v Brown ・ R v Bryan ・ R v Brydges ・ R v Buhay ・ R v Burgess ・ R v Burgess; Ex parte Henry ・ R v Burlingham ・ R v Butler ・ R v Béland ・ R v Canadian Dredge & Dock Co ・ R v Carroll ・ R v Carto ・ R v Chaulk ・ R v Chaytor ・ R v Cheshire ・ R v Church of Scientology of Toronto ・ R v Cinous ・ R v Clarke ・ R v Clarkson ・ R v Clay ・ R v Cogdon ・ R v Collins ・ R v Collins (1987) ・ R v Coney ・ R v Constanza ・ R v Cook Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Carto ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Carto ''R v Carto''〔1917 EDL 87.〕 is an important case in South African law, heard in the Eastern Districts Local Division on March 12, 1917, with judgment handed down on March 17. Graham JP (who wrote the judgment) and Sampson J were the presiding officers. It is significant for its contribution to the principle of legality, with its stipulation that "to render any act criminal in our law, there must be some punishment affixed to the commission of the act," and that "where no law exists affixing such punishment there is no crime in law."〔95.〕 == Facts == By Regulation 30, the Town Council of Grahamstown was empowered, ''inter alia'', to prohibit the watering or irrigation of gardens; by Regulation 45, penalties were provided for behaviour contrary to the regulations, although no special penalty was provided. The Council authorised the board of works, a committee appointed under Grahamstown Municipal Act 18 of 1902,〔s 71〕 to adopt measures to minimise the daily consumption of water. The board of works passed a resolution to the effect "that a notice should be inserted in the local press prohibiting the use of reservoir water on gardens until further notice." A notice was published in the local press, but not in the Gazette. There was no minute of a report of its resolution by the board of works to the Town Council, and the Town Clerk had no recollection of such a report, but the Mayor stated that the chairman of the board of works had made such a report, when he applied for and obtained the Council's authority to prosecute for failure to comply with the resolution. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Carto」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.